Australia bans MSC Kia Ora

The Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) has banned the 1,118 teu containership MSC Kia Ora from Australian ports for three months after the operator failed to ensure crew were paid their wages in full and on time, and that critical equipment was maintained.

AMSA inspected the ship in the Port of Brisbane March 14 after receiving a complaint which alleged that crew had been underpaid.

During the inspection AMSA found evidence that crew had been underpaid for the previous four months and were owed more than A$53,000 ($41,000). The outstanding wages had been transferred to the crew just 24 hours before the inspection.

“Failure to pay crew their wages in full and on time is a clear and unacceptable breach of the Maritime Labour Convention,” AMSA’s general manager of operations Allan Schwartz said.

Further breaches of the Maritime Labour Convention were also found during the inspection relating to hours of rest and fitness for duty, Schwartz said, placing the safety of the crew and the ship at risk.

The inspection also revealed that two of the ship’s four generators were defective as well as the starboard main engine fire damper. In total, 24 deficiencies were issued to the MSC Kia Ora. The ship was detained the same evening.

AMSA reinspected the MSC Kia Ora earlier this week and was satisfied that all detainable deficiencies had been rectified. The ship was released from detention and immediately issued with a ban, preventing it from accessing Australian ports for a period of three months.

MSC Kia Ora is operated by Vega-Reederei, the same company which operated the Vega Auriga, which AMSA banned in 2014.

In a statement sent to Splash, MSC, the world’s second largest liner company, pointed out: “MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company is a responsible employer and would like to make clear that it does not oversee the maintenance, or the workforce, of the chartered vessel Kia Ora.

“MSC is not the target of a recent Australian Maritime Safety Authority instruction about crew wages: this is directed to the owner of this vessel. The vessel was off-hired immediately upon MSC becoming aware of the AMSA findings.”

“Sub-standard and poorly managed ships that place the welfare of their crews at risk will not be tolerated in Australian waters,” AMSA’s Schwartz stressed.

AMSA has banned five ships in the past two years.

Sam Chambers

Starting out with the Informa Group in 2000 in Hong Kong, Sam Chambers became editor of Maritime Asia magazine as well as East Asia Editor for the world’s oldest newspaper, Lloyd’s List. In 2005 he pursued a freelance career and wrote for a variety of titles including taking on the role of Asia Editor at Seatrade magazine and China correspondent for Supply Chain Asia. His work has also appeared in The Economist, The New York Times, The Sunday Times and The International Herald Tribune.


  1. Can somebody with more experience of these things explain to me whether MSC can give this excuse. If they are hiring a ship can’t they do so on conditions. Sub-standard shipping is the bane of seafarers’ existence. Should not not also be MSC’s responsibility to ensure vessels it hires are of a certain standard? The oil majors do it, or do they do it differently?

Back to top button