China’s Belt Road Initiative and the demise of the 20,000 teu boxship

China’s Belt Road Initiative and the demise of the 20,000 teu boxship

Having been on a speaking trip in China to discuss the China Belt Road Initiative (BRI), it still amazes me that there are senior maritime executives that argue shipping will return to ‘normal’ and is currently going through ;just another shipping cycle’. What they fail to understand is that the BRI is rewriting what the new normal in Asia will look like.

Whilst there is a general over capacity, exacerbated by more teu carrying capacity to come on line in 2018, the shape of the recovery is up for debate. There is a backlog of 2.9m teu to come on stream over the next two years. We have already seen massive liner consolidation, but the challenge will be what mix of vessels should be in the market and specifically what size. Answers to these questions, will to an extent, be influenced by the BRI.

A cornerstone of the BRI is to pair ports and rail networks so as to give an optimal mix of transport mode to end customers. As end customers become more demanding in terms of delivery performance focus has shifted to integrating simple end-to-end solutions to continuous supply chain needs of lower inventory levels, regular delivery and shorter product planning cycles. It is expected that by 2020, the BRI network will have 8.1m active tracking devices for cargo – making the industry a lot more transparent. The pairing of ports with rail, coupled with this new transparency, is creating new hub and spoke logistics networks and patterns. For example the Yangtze River / Shanghai Port pairing has one of eight horizontal rail lines connecting Shanghai with Chongqing and Wuhan and 11 river ports. There is an accelerated formation of regional rail hubs and networks with a focus on international freight. In particular, Shanghai is moving from a current base of 1.5 % of international trade volume by rail to 20% – 30% by rail. This will reduce the dominance of shipping as a mode of freight transport.

In recent times there has also been the articulation of the blue economic passages (BEP) that align ports / rail and road.  There are 3 BEPs (maritime trade routes):

  • China – India Ocean/Africa;
  • China-Australia/ South Pacific;
  • China – Russia / Northern Europe via the Arctic circle.

Other patterns emerging that will have an impact, include:

  • 20 block trains a week out of Chongqing into European destinations;
  • Confirmed China’s economic development transfer from coastal cities to central/western regions, connecting low cost inland manufacturing centres to Eurasia;
  • Plan to have 50,000 annual freight train journeys  moving 2m teu of trade volume by rail by 2021;
  • New issues emerging involve capacity at border crossings including capability of inland terminals and rolling stock;
  • Transfer sidings and stations can now tranship 100 teu of cargo between gauges within 40 minutes;
  • Currently there are 11 freight trains a day out of China, average length is 45 x 40 HQ containers;
  • Types of cargo that are identified as rail freight includes: electronics, textile and agricultural;
  • Development of short sea shipping and train route connections;
  • China controls 77 ports in the region with financial interest in 105;
  • Environmental regulations support a port / rail network with shipping having to meet ECA regulations.

It is already notable that China is actively supporting this new paradigm. There is a complex system of subsidies for rail use, depending on what development focus is being taken. The subsidies are dependent on what commodities and individual provinces agenda is. In some cases electronics get no subsidy whilst fresh food and products attract a subsidy. The provinces control the subsidies depending on the city / province / Beijing development plan.

What does this mean for shipping? Whilst it is clear that shipping will still be an important component, it will not be as dominant as a new Eurasian trade block emerges. With all this activity around the new transport infrastructure brought about by the BRI, the new cargo / freight forwarding instruments will be based on optimising freight modes. When considering this optimal mix of rail / sea / road modes, it is suggested that the need for 20,000+ teu vessels is limited, and that modern fleets will be focussed on 10,000 to 14,000 teu vessels.

Andre Wheeler

CEO of Asia Pacific Connex with more than 20 years’ experience in international business, with a diverse network throughout the USA, Asia, SE Asia , Africa and the United Kingdom. Holding a B. Science (Hons) degree and an MBA, he is currently working towards his Doctorate on the Impact of the China One Belt One Road initiative. Andre has expertise in oil/gas, construction, marine services and mining.

Related Posts

1 Comment

  1. Wang dapeng
    March 27, 2018 at 3:07 pm

    The time of carriers relying on constant capital injection to survive would be over in the near future. Who control the route, who have the platform, who will be the final winner. So the Big ship would be the mega taxi belong to ship owner only.