Dry CargoEuropeOperationsTankers

Ships pull back in wake of latest Russian attacks 

Ships are backing up along the western edge of the Black Sea at the entrance to the Danube and outside Romania’s Constanta port amid severe uncertainty over how to proceed with exports from Ukraine after multiple Russian attacks on port locations and the decision last week to end the Black Sea Grain Initiative

Russia’s decision to target port infrastructure along the Danube, alongside bombardments of Black Sea port cities such as Odesa, has seen ships pull back from making dangerous voyages. 

Adding to the Black Sea shipping tension, both Ukraine and Russia have stated they will treat commercial ships heading to enemy ports as potentially carrying military cargoes. 

Insurers have indicated that previously available Black Sea war risk cover will no longer be offered as the situation deteriorates. 

Source: MarineTraffic

Dramatic video posted on social media yesterday (see below) captured the moment Russian forces launched drone strikes on the Danube port of Reni. Another Danube port, Izmail, has also been attacked as part of Russia’s strategy to hit Ukraine’s grain export infrastructure.

Romanian president Klaus Iohannis condemned the attack, calling it an “escalation” that posed risks to wider security in the Black Sea region and global food security. Many ships along the river have decided to drop anchor while waiting for clarification on how to proceed. 

Pre-war the Black Sea represented 3.4% of total tanker loadings and 4% of total dry bulk loadings, according to analysis by Jefferies, an investment bank. These have now fallen to 2.3% and 2.8%, respectively, with Jefferies suggesting they could decline more stretching the global fleet further.

Sam Chambers

Starting out with the Informa Group in 2000 in Hong Kong, Sam Chambers became editor of Maritime Asia magazine as well as East Asia Editor for the world’s oldest newspaper, Lloyd’s List. In 2005 he pursued a freelance career and wrote for a variety of titles including taking on the role of Asia Editor at Seatrade magazine and China correspondent for Supply Chain Asia. His work has also appeared in The Economist, The New York Times, The Sunday Times and The International Herald Tribune.

Comments

  1. I don’t understand why we are not allowing Ukraine to launch inside Russia, NATO should be punishing Russia.

    1. But the Zelensky regime is launching inside Russia, to Moscow and beyond, with NATO weapons and encourage t.
      The Russian Federation will respond to this for sure

  2. This is a war of 6 and two threes,
    It is a ideological war between democracy and autocracy with both seeking world domination

      1. I just wonder, how stupid can really be the western societies? Really?
        The war is paid from your money, in the interest of the political clientele from your countries and you are delighted that instead of having decent standard of living , you are sending weapons to Ukraine.
        Wait, I just realised. Very, very stupid.

        1. Russians that back Putin are the stupid ones. They believe his lies as he sends their sons to die for nothing just to feed his ego. He will be crushed and remembered alongside Hitler and Saddam Hussein.

    1. The world is not black or white and most democracies are not interested in domination let alone world domination. You must be a Vlad bot.

  3. All we are responsible for the current global situation…reduce your own consuption of everything from a car use to a big plate of food in a fancy restaurant. Global economy disaster? Yes! That will balance things.

  4. Vlad is the greatest Leader of our times. I’m sorry about your Brits. You have unelected Indian stooge as a PM and Carlos the Third as a king. Ha-ha-ha! The whole world is laughing at you.
    And I said nothing about “peacekeeper’s” leader dementia joe…

    1. Interesting that you imply it is the Brits whereas it has next to nothing to do with them. Tell your bot controller to do better.

Back to top button