The offshore industry and modern slavery

The offshore industry and modern slavery

Slavery is a matter for history, not for the oil and gas industry. Or is it? Simon Hems from law firm Ince & Co explains.

Only last month, an offshore supply vessel, the MV Malaviya Seven, and her sister ship, the Malaviya Twenty, both owned by GOL Offshore, were detained in Scotland and Great Yarmouth respectively after it was alleged that Indian crew members onboard the Malaviya Seven had not received any wages for at least two months.

It is understood that the vessel was providing offshore services to a number of companies operating in the North Sea. The vessels are now likely to be detained for weeks, if not months, whilst the situation is resolved. At best, the vessels’ clients are deprived of the services the vessels were contracted for; at worst, those companies may also find themselves in a slavery investigation.

In addition, on June 10, 2016, the UK’s High Court handed down its first ever judgment under the Modern Slavery Act 2015. In its judgment, the High Court found a gangmaster company liable to compensate victims of modern slavery, although the level of compensation has yet to be determined. The workers in question were from Lithuania and had been trafficked to the UK and were working in supply chains producing premium free-range eggs for McDonalds and leading British supermarket chains.

These cases highlight the need for all companies to take adequate steps to ensure that they are not unwittingly participating in modern slavery.

Why is this important?

The Modern Slavery Act 2015 (MSA) was introduced to the UK’s House of Commons as a bill in October 2013, received Royal Assent on March 26, 2015 and came into force on July 31, 2015.

The purpose of the MSA is to consolidate existing slavery and human trafficking offences whilst increasing the maximum penalties for such offences. It also establishes an independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner; introduces new restrictions on those convicted, or not yet convicted, of offences under the Act and introduces new compensatory measures and protections for victims of trafficking.

Under the MSA, a person commits an offence if it holds another person in slavery or servitude, or requires or forces another person to perform compulsory labour. There is also a further offence where a person “arranges or facilitates the travel of another person” with a view to that person being exploited.

These offences are applicable to any UK national regardless of where in the world the offence takes place, or to any non-UK national if any part of the arrangements or facilitation takes place in the UK, or if the travel consists of arriving into, departing, or travelling within the UK.

Both civil and criminal penalties can attach to any offence under the MSA and, in some circumstances, the Act provides for the forfeiture of vessels that have been used (or were intended to be used) for trafficking.

Obligations on companies

Under Part 6 of the MSA, commercial organisations caught by the Act must prepare a slavery and human trafficking statement for each financial year. This is a statement of the steps the organisation has taken during the financial year to ensure that slavery and human trafficking is not taking place in any of its supply chains and in any part of its own business. Alternatively, a statement can be filed stating that no steps have been taken.

Companies that will need to fulfil this obligation are any that carry on a business or part of a business in any part of the UK, supply goods and services and have a total turnover of not less than an amount prescribed by the Secretary of State. Following a consultation process, the relevant turnover figure is currently £36m, and this includes turnover from a company’s subsidiaries.


As set out above, it is early days for the MSA and many issues of interpretation of the Act remain outstanding before the full extent of its reach and impact is known. However, contractors and shipowners need to be aware that there are potentially far reaching consequences of failure to adequately assess the risk of slavery occurring in their supply chains, or indeed their business, including possible detention or forfeiture of their vessels or vessels that are involved in providing offshore services to them.

If you have any doubt about whether the reporting obligation described in this article applies to you, or need help in completing the necessary report, please get in touch.

Related Posts


  1. Avatar
    Therese Canning
    July 29, 2016 at 9:58 am

    Thank you Splash for highlighting this issue. By its nature the full extent of this problem is unknown but I would urge anyone who becomes aware of trafficking or slavery to be as brave as they can be in reporting it. It should have no place in 21st century commerce.

  2. Avatar
    Andrew Craig-Bennett
    July 29, 2016 at 10:09 am

    A very timely article. It would be good if European Port State Control inspectors were all thoroughly briefed on “what to look for”. There is an attitude that “crew pay is a matter for the ITF”, but just dumping the issue of legal compliance onto a trades union organisation is not good enough.

  3. Avatar
    Apostleship of the Sea
    August 4, 2016 at 8:38 am

    This incident also highlights the vital work that seafarers’ charities do to support crew who find themselves in such situations. In this instance Apostleship of the Sea’s Aberdeen port chaplain Doug Duncan was able to assist the crew of the MV Malaviya Seven, whom he had met before. Getting support from someone they know and trust makes a difference.